2 edition of Case of Stamoulakatos v. Greece (30/1992/375/449) found in the catalog.
Case of Stamoulakatos v. Greece (30/1992/375/449)
European Court of Human Rights.
Case of Thlimmenos v. Greece (Application no. /97) Date: 06/04/ A Jehovah’s Witness, Mr Thlimmenos was convicted of a felony offence for having refused to enlist in the army at a time when Greece did not offer alternative service to conscientious objectors to military service. A few years later he was refused appointment as a. COMMISSION V GREECE admissible where all the stages of the pre-litigation procedure, including the letter of formal notice, have occurred after the Treaty on European Union entered into force. (see para.. 42) 2. Whilst Article 4 of Directive 75/ on waste did not specify the actual content of the measures to be taken by the.
Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening) Greece Ambatielos (Greece v. United Kingdom) Aegean Sea Continental Shelf (Greece v. Turkey) Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening) Application of the Interim Accord of 13 September (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Made from birch with wood inlay. The bottom is covered in felt and the lid is glass with brass hardware. This case can be customized with either a black or red felt lining. Width 12 inches Height inches Length4/5(3).
COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE LHOMME EUROP EAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS COURT (CHAMBER) CASE OFPAPAMICHALOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE (ARTICLE 50) (Application no/89) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 31 October PAPAMICHALOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE (ARTICLE 50) JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Papamichalopoulos and Others v. PRESS RELEASE No 48/00 4 July Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C/97 Commission v Greece THE COURT OF JUSTICE ORDERS GREECE TO PAY A PENALTY PAYMENT OF 20 EUROS PER DAY. For the first time, the Court of Justice imposes a penalty on a Member State for failure to comply with one of its previous judgments.
Rock art studies
Beilstein 3/4 Band 27 Teil11
Talk about teaching!
Traveling with the Maggid
International Tax Seminar, May 28, 1998, Montréal
Teen involvement for drug abuse prevention
Dump-Further Adv of Joker-27c
Britain as A Market For Developing Countries.
Federate or fail
SITAROPOULOS AND GIAKOUMOPOULOS v. GREECE JUDGMENT 3 THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE The applicants were born in and respectively and live in Strasbourg. They are officials of the Council of Europe.
By Presidential Decree no. / of 18 Augustthe GreekFile Size: KB. GRAND CHAMBER CASE OF VALLIANATOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE (Applications nos. /09 and /09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 7 November This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. MAKARATZIS v.
GREECE JUDGMENT 3 THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE The applicant was born in and lives in Athens. Outline of events. MAKARATZIS v. GREECE JUDGMENT 3 THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE The applicant was born in and lives in Athens.
Outline of events In the evening of 13 September the police tried to stop the applicant, who had driven through a red traffic light in the centre of Athens, near the American embassy. View Konstantinos Stamoulakatos’ profile on LinkedIn, the world's largest professional community.
Konstantinos has 4 jobs listed on their profile. See the complete profile on LinkedIn and discover Konstantinos’ connections and jobs at similar : Director Of Finance And. The Greek Case: Report of the Commission: Application No. /Denmark V. Greece; Application No.
/Norway V. Greece; Application No. /Sweden V. Greece; Application No. /Netherlands V. Greece, Volume 1, Issue 2. THE FORMER KING OF GREECE AND OTHERS v. GREECE JUDGMENT 1 In the case of the former King of Greece and Others v.
Greece, The European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of the following judges: Mr L. WILDHABER, President, Mrs E. PALM, Mr J.-P. COSTA, Mr L. FERRARI BRAVO, Mr GAUKUR JÖRUNDSSON, Mr L. CAFLISCH,File Size: KB. The applicants, complained, under Article 6 § 1 and Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, about the failure of the authorities to comply with two decisions of the national Supreme Administrative Court annulling two permits for the construction of buildings near their property.
The first applicant was the owner of a house. Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. May Koufaki and Adedy v. Greece (dec.) - /12 and /12 Decision [Section I] Article 1 of Protocol No.
1 Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Reduction in remuneration, benefits, bonuses and retirement pensions of public servants: inadmissibleFile Size: KB.
The judgment delivered by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the case of Mamatas and Others v Greece is of the utmost legal and political significance. The case concerned the Private Sector Involvement (PSI) Agreement: the ‘haircut’ imposed on Greek government bonds for the purposes of reducing the volume of Greek debt.
Edition Notes At head of title: Yearbook of the European convention on human rights. "This volume contains the Report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the "Greek Case" (Application No. /67, Denmark vs. Greece; No. /67, Norway vs. Greece; No. /67, Sweden vs.
Greece; No. Netherlands vs. Greece) and the Resolution DH Pages: THLIMMENOS v. GREECE JUDGMENT 3 THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A. The applicant's conviction for insubordination 7. On 9 December the Athens Permanent Army Tribunal (Diarkes Stratodikio), composed of one career military judge and four other officers, convicted the applicant, a Jehovah's Witness, of insubordination for having.
This work analyzes the jurisdictional powers of international tribunals in certain areas of fundamental significance and importance. It clarifies how tribunals and consensual arrangements have approached problems and which general principles may have emerged.
Special aspects of jurisdiction of some particular tribunals have been studied in greater detail.5/5(1). In the case of Sidiropoulos and Others v.
Greece 1, The European Court of Human Rights,vol. 3, book 9, p. 35). James and Webster v. the United Kingdom case (13 AugustSeries A no. 44) the Court held that Arti notwithstanding its autonomous role and particular sphere of application, could also be considered in the.
Case of Vallianatos and Others v. Greece: Another Step towards Realizing the Equal Protection of Same-Sex Relationships: /ch The case of Vallianatos and Others v. Greece concerns whether or not the “non-marital partnership,” designed solely for opposite-sex couples according toAuthor: Despina Kiltidou.
Books at Amazon. The Books homepage helps you explore Earth's Biggest Bookstore without ever leaving the comfort of your couch. Here you'll find current best sellers in books, new releases in books, deals in books, Kindle eBooks, Audible audiobooks, and. On 22 Septemberthe First Section of the European Court of Human Rights handed down a judgment in Koutsoliontos and Pantazis v Greece ( ECHR )(in French), in response to two applications made against the Hellenic Republic, alleging a violation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Court ruled that the domestic court’s order of.
By Sara Lembrechts – Researcher at University of Antwerp & Policy Advisor at Children’s Rights Knowledge Centre (KeKi), Belgium. Summary. In the Chamber judgment M.K. v Greece of 1 February (application no.
/16), the European Court of Human Rights decided by a majority of five votes to two that the applicant’s right to family life under Article 8 ECHR had. Get this from a library. Affaire Stamoulakatos c. Gréce: arrêt du 26 octobre = Case of Stamoulakatos v.
Greece: judgment of 26 October [Nicolas Stamoulakatos; European Court of Human Rights.]. The Case of Greece Athianos Stergios 1 Vazakidis Athanasios 2 Dritsakis Nikolaos 3 Abstract This paper investigates the effects of adopting International Accounting Standards (IAS) on financial statements and their value relevance for a sample of Greek firms during By implementing an innovative research design, we make aCited by:.
The Chowdhury v Greece case was the first occasion on which the European Court of Human Rights had to examine the situation of forced labour and trafficking in the agricultural sector. A focus of the legal submissions was the control mechanisms exercised by traffickers and how freedom of movement does not undermine a finding of forced labour or.OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE OF MAKARATZIS v.
GREECE (Application no. /99) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 20 December This judgment is final but may be subject to editorial Size: KB.CASE OF SERIF v. GREECE (Application no. /97) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 14 December FINAL 14/03/ SERIF V. GREECE JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Serif v.
Greece, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Mr M. FISCHBACH, President, Mr C.L.